Before we start making this documentary, we need to make sure we are organized. This means:
- We must know what people we are going to interview
- We need to know where we are going to find these people.
- The questions we are going to ask should be pre-meditated, leaving room for some to be improvised if the occasion allows it.
- We should also make sure we are allowed to film everywhere we want to go.
Students, teachers, parents, businessmen, and educators were all interviewed for this documentary. Each one was interviewed in their "rooms". Students, for example, were interviewed in their bedrooms, teachers in classrooms, educators in offices. There were many different tyes of footage used throughout the documentary. This includes animations, actual original footage shot for the film, archive footage of someone making a speech, for example, and also borrowed footage, notably from the movie The School of Rock (Linklater, 2003) and from the television series The Simpsons.
Post-Production
Editing is the main factor in post-production. Surely many hours of film footage that was shot for the documentary did not make the final cut. The footage must have been filtered a great deal, leaving only the footage that make up the documentary we just saw. This footage, however, was organized in such a way that it tells a complete story in just under 2 hours. The footage has been ordered so that we get to meet the children, their parents, and then the problem facing their education and the people wanting to fix it. All of this is done in such a way that it engages us and makes us aware of the problem. Music is a big factor to achieve this, and it is present in several instances throughout the documentary. In moments that are sad, the music encourages us to feel sad. In uplifting moments, uplifting music is chosen to accompany the situation.
Aside from the music, the other important non-diagetic sound is the director's (Davis Guggenheim) voice over. I think Guggenheim chose to do the voice-overs himself because it an issue he is personally concerned about, as he explains throughout the beginning of the documentary. This is also evident in the fact that his first documentary (of which footage is borrowed for this one) is also about education in public schools. It also adds a degree of authenticity to the whole matter; that the people who made the film actually care about it.
In my opinion, the ending is a terribly sad one. I don't know if the filmmakers intended it to be this way, because, by some angles, it should be a happy ending. This makes me think that Guggenheim chose an ambiguous end to his film on purpose, which is interesting. It is clear, as the credits also suggest, that this is an issue the filmmakers want us to be concerned about, and that there are people wanting to make a change, like filmmakers are, for example. But maybe they are suggesting something deeper. Maybe they are trying to say, underneath it all, that people just don't care enough to make a change, that too few people care about the children, and that no amount of documentaries can ever change that.
















